# LanLens vs Zabbix

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LanLens | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 146 | 6 518 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +107 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go Template |

## Which one should you pick?

Zabbix scores 75/100 against 45/100 for LanLens, so it is the safer default.

LanLens ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.

If you want the quickest setup, LanLens is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.

Zabbix is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LanLens](https://selfhost.directory/project/lanlens) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lanlens.md)
- [Zabbix](https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lanlens-vs-zabbix