# LanLens vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LanLens | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 147 | 2 675 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +18 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v2.18.30 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

WBO scores 61/100 against 45/100 for LanLens, so it is the safer default.

LanLens ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for WBO.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; LanLens needs more configuration.

WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LanLens](https://selfhost.directory/project/lanlens) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lanlens.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lanlens-vs-wbo