# LanLens vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LanLens | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 147 | 61 550 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +488 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 45/100 for LanLens, so it is the safer default.

LanLens ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+488 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LanLens](https://selfhost.directory/project/lanlens) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lanlens.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lanlens-vs-pi-hole