# LanLens vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted [Network Monitoring projects](https://selfhost.directory/network-monitoring), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LanLens | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 146 | 46 459 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 324 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 45/100 for LanLens, so it is the safer default.

LanLens ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 324 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LanLens](https://selfhost.directory/project/lanlens) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lanlens.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lanlens-vs-mitmproxy