# Langfuse vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Langfuse | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 124 in AI | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 36 686 ✓ | 15 762 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 661 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 161 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | v4.71.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Langfuse scores 86/100 against 76/100 for Zigbee2MQTT, so it is the safer default.

Langfuse ships more often: 161 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Zigbee2MQTT.

If you want the quickest setup, Zigbee2MQTT is easier to run; Langfuse needs more configuration.

Langfuse is growing faster right now (+1 661 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Langfuse](https://selfhost.directory/project/langfuse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langfuse.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)
- [Langfuse vs Opik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-opik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-zigbee2mqtt