# Langfuse vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Langfuse | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 125 in AI | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 36 658 ✓ | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 675 ✓ | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 161 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.71.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Langfuse scores 86/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

Langfuse ships more often: 161 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.

If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; Langfuse needs more configuration.

Langfuse is growing faster right now (+1 675 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Langfuse](https://selfhost.directory/project/langfuse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langfuse.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)
- [Langfuse vs Opik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-opik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-woodpecker-ci