# Langfuse vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Langfuse | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 125 in AI | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 36 655 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 672 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 161 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v4.71.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Langfuse scores 86/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

Langfuse ships more often: 161 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; Langfuse needs more configuration.

Langfuse is growing faster right now (+1 672 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Langfuse](https://selfhost.directory/project/langfuse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langfuse.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)
- [Langfuse vs Opik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-opik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-uusec-waf