# Langfuse vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Langfuse | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 124 in AI | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 36 689 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 664 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 161 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v4.71.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Langfuse scores 86/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Langfuse ships more often: 161 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

Langfuse is growing faster right now (+1 664 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Langfuse](https://selfhost.directory/project/langfuse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langfuse.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)
- [Langfuse vs Opik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-opik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-tube-archivist