# Langfuse vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Langfuse | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 125 in AI | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 36 635 | 117 613 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 652 | +5 254 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 161 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.71.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Langfuse and TradingAgents score the same (86/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

Langfuse ships more often: 161 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Langfuse needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 254 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Langfuse](https://selfhost.directory/project/langfuse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langfuse.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)
- [Langfuse vs Opik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-opik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-tradingagents