# Langfuse vs Rembg

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Langfuse | Rembg |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 125 in AI | #1 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 36 667 ✓ | 25 217 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 642 ✓ | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 161 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.71.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.0.86 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Langfuse scores 86/100 against 78/100 for Rembg, so it is the safer default.

Langfuse ships more often: 161 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Rembg.

If you want the quickest setup, Rembg is easier to run; Langfuse needs more configuration.

Langfuse is growing faster right now (+1 642 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Langfuse](https://selfhost.directory/project/langfuse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langfuse.md)
- [Rembg](https://selfhost.directory/project/rembg) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rembg.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)
- [Langfuse vs Opik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-opik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-rembg