# langflow vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | langflow | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 156 112 ✓ | 6 048 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +921 ✓ | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

langflow is growing faster right now (+921 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langflow-vs-zammad