# langflow vs retroassembly

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | langflow | retroassembly |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 156 137 ✓ | 1 153 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +915 ✓ | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.

langflow is growing faster right now (+915 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)
- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langflow-vs-retroassembly