# langflow vs QGIS Web Client

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | langflow | QGIS Web Client |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 156 136 ✓ | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +914 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.

langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.

If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.

langflow is growing faster right now (+914 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)
- [QGIS Web Client](https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langflow-vs-qwc2