# langflow vs Qtap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | langflow | Qtap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 156 121 ✓ | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +899 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.

langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.

If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.

langflow is growing faster right now (+899 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)
- [Qtap](https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langflow-vs-qtap