# langflow vs OxMgr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | langflow | OxMgr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 20 in Application Management |
| GitHub stars | 156 136 ✓ | 295 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +914 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 49/100 for OxMgr, so it is the safer default.

langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for OxMgr.

If you want the quickest setup, OxMgr is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.

langflow is growing faster right now (+914 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)
- [OxMgr](https://selfhost.directory/project/oxmgr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/oxmgr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langflow-vs-oxmgr