# langflow vs Opencast

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | langflow | Opencast |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #38 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 156 138 ✓ | 509 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +916 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | 20.5 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | ECL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 57/100 for Opencast, so it is the safer default.

langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Opencast.

If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; Opencast needs more configuration.

langflow is growing faster right now (+916 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)
- [Opencast](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencast) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencast.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langflow-vs-opencast