# langflow vs Obscura

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | langflow | Obscura |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 156 109 ✓ | 29 526 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +918 ✓ | +442 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 75/100 for Obscura, so it is the safer default.

langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Obscura.

If you want the quickest setup, Obscura is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.

langflow is growing faster right now (+918 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)
- [Obscura](https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langflow-vs-obscura