# langflow vs MikroDash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | langflow | MikroDash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 156 136 ✓ | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +914 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.

langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for MikroDash.

If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.

langflow is growing faster right now (+914 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)
- [MikroDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langflow-vs-mikrodash