# langflow vs MCSManager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | langflow | MCSManager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #8 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 156 109 ✓ | 5 005 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +918 ✓ | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.

langflow is growing faster right now (+918 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)
- [MCSManager](https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langflow-vs-mcsmanager