# langflow vs Lumabri

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | langflow | Lumabri |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 156 112 ✓ | 202 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +921 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.8.0 · 12 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 42/100 for Lumabri, so it is the safer default.

langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Lumabri.

If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; Lumabri needs more configuration.

langflow is growing faster right now (+921 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)
- [Lumabri](https://selfhost.directory/project/lumabri) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lumabri.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langflow-vs-lumabri