# langflow vs livekit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | langflow | livekit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 156 109 ✓ | 21 895 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +918 ✓ | +820 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 80/100 for livekit, so it is the safer default.

langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for livekit.

If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.

## Details

- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)
- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/langflow-vs-livekit