# Lance vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Lance | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #53 of 125 in AI | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 1 362 | 93 082 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +58 141 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 49/100 for Lance, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Lance.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; Lance needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 141 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Lance](https://selfhost.directory/project/lance) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lance.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lance-vs-omnivoice-studio