# LAN-Orangutan vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LAN-Orangutan | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 139 | 114 258 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 549 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 58/100 for LAN-Orangutan, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for LAN-Orangutan.

If you want the quickest setup, LAN-Orangutan is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 549 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LAN-Orangutan](https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lan-orangutan-vs-supabase