# LAN-Orangutan vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LAN-Orangutan | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 1 140 | 35 798 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +837 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 58/100 for LAN-Orangutan, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for LAN-Orangutan.

If you want the quickest setup, LAN-Orangutan is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+837 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LAN-Orangutan](https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lan-orangutan-vs-seaweedfs