# LAN-Orangutan vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LAN-Orangutan | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 1 139 | 393 295 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 947 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 58/100 for LAN-Orangutan, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for LAN-Orangutan.

If you want the quickest setup, LAN-Orangutan is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 947 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LAN-Orangutan](https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lan-orangutan-vs-openclaw