# LAN-Orangutan vs Nomad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LAN-Orangutan | Nomad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 1 139 | 17 049 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +80 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Nomad scores 76/100 against 58/100 for LAN-Orangutan, so it is the safer default.

Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for LAN-Orangutan.

If you want the quickest setup, LAN-Orangutan is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.

Nomad is growing faster right now (+80 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LAN-Orangutan](https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan.md)
- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lan-orangutan-vs-nomad