# LabTether vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LabTether | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 233 | 24 054 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +776 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 17 Apr 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 51/100 for LabTether, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for LabTether.

If you want the quickest setup, LabTether is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+776 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LabTether](https://selfhost.directory/project/labtether) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/labtether.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/labtether-vs-temporal