# LabTether vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LabTether | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 233 | 132 679 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 224 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 1462 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 17 Apr 2026 | b11976 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 51/100 for LabTether, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1462 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for LabTether.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 224 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LabTether](https://selfhost.directory/project/labtether) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/labtether.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/labtether-vs-llamacpp