# label-studio vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | label-studio | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Data Collection | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 28 579 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +236 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.23.2 · 29 Sept 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

label-studio scores 80/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for label-studio.

If you want the quickest setup, label-studio is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

label-studio is growing faster right now (+236 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [label-studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/label-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/label-studio.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/label-studio-vs-tube-archivist