# Kutt vs UrlHum

> Two self-hosted [URL Shortener projects](https://selfhost.directory/url-shortener), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kutt | UrlHum |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 23 in URL Shortener | #14 of 23 in URL Shortener |
| GitHub stars | 11 181 ✓ | 687 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +62 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.2.6 · 5 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Kutt scores 69/100 against 44/100 for UrlHum, so it is the safer default.

Kutt ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for UrlHum.

If you want the quickest setup, Kutt is easier to run; UrlHum needs more configuration.

Kutt is growing faster right now (+62 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kutt](https://selfhost.directory/project/kutt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kutt.md)
- [UrlHum](https://selfhost.directory/project/urlhum) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urlhum.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kutt-vs-urlhum