# Kutt vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kutt | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 23 in URL Shortener | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 11 183 ✓ | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.2.6 · 5 Jul 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

Kutt scores 69/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kutt.

If you want the quickest setup, Kutt is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

Kutt is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kutt](https://selfhost.directory/project/kutt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kutt.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kutt-vs-urbit