# Kutt vs Typebot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kutt | Typebot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 23 in URL Shortener | #1 of 6 in Chatbot |
| GitHub stars | 11 183 ✓ | 10 587 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +223 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.2.6 · 5 Jul 2026 | v3.19.1 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Typebot scores 70/100 against 69/100 for Kutt, so it is the safer default.

Typebot ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kutt.

If you want the quickest setup, Kutt is easier to run; Typebot needs more configuration.

Typebot is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kutt](https://selfhost.directory/project/kutt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kutt.md)
- [Typebot](https://selfhost.directory/project/typebot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typebot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kutt-vs-typebot