KuttvsSparkyFitness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kutt | SparkyFitness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 23 in URL Shortener | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 11 184 | 6 504 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +393 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 27 |
| Latest release | v3.2.6 · 5 Jul 2026 | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Kutt scores 69/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.
SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kutt.
If you want the quickest setup, Kutt is easier to run; SparkyFitness needs more configuration.
SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+393 stars in 30 days).
Kutt details →SparkyFitness details →