# Kutt vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kutt | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 23 in URL Shortener | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 11 184 | 35 799 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +838 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.2.6 · 5 Jul 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 69/100 for Kutt, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kutt.

If you want the quickest setup, Kutt is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+838 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kutt](https://selfhost.directory/project/kutt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kutt.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kutt-vs-seaweedfs