# Kutt vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kutt | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 23 in URL Shortener | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 183 | 45 023 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +1 622 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.2.6 · 5 Jul 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 69/100 for Kutt, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kutt.

If you want the quickest setup, Kutt is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kutt](https://selfhost.directory/project/kutt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kutt.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kutt-vs-reactive-resume