# Kutt vs Matomo

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kutt | Matomo |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 23 in URL Shortener | #3 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 11 182 | 21 985 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 | +92 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 41 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.2.6 · 5 Jul 2026 | 6.0.0-b9.20261028180522 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Matomo scores 74/100 against 69/100 for Kutt, so it is the safer default.

Matomo ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kutt.

If you want the quickest setup, Kutt is easier to run; Matomo needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Kutt](https://selfhost.directory/project/kutt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kutt.md)
- [Matomo](https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kutt-vs-matomo