# Kula vs qdrant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kula | qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 1 339 | 35 299 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +528 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.21.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 55/100 for Kula, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Kula.

If you want the quickest setup, Kula is easier to run; qdrant needs more configuration.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+528 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kula](https://selfhost.directory/project/kula) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kula.md)
- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kula-vs-qdrant