# kubo vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | kubo | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 17 161 | 24 057 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +19 | +779 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.43.1 · 14 Sept 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 71/100 for kubo, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for kubo.

If you want the quickest setup, kubo is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [kubo](https://selfhost.directory/project/kubo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kubo.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kubo-vs-temporal