# kubo vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | kubo | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 161 | 95 289 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +19 | +2 327 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.43.1 · 14 Sept 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 71/100 for kubo, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for kubo.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [kubo](https://selfhost.directory/project/kubo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kubo.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kubo-vs-stirling-pdf