# kubo vs MediaMTX

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | kubo | MediaMTX |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 17 160 | 20 538 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +302 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.43.1 · 14 Sept 2026 | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 71/100 for kubo, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for kubo.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; kubo needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [kubo](https://selfhost.directory/project/kubo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kubo.md)
- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kubo-vs-mediamtx