# Kubero vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kubero | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in PaaS | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 4 455 | 7 362 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +29 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext scores 71/100 against 62/100 for Kubero, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; Kubero needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Kubero](https://selfhost.directory/project/kubero) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kubero.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kubero-vs-sdnext