# Kubero vs ryot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kubero | ryot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in PaaS | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 4 455 ✓ | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +29 | +42 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ryot scores 63/100 against 62/100 for Kubero, so it is the safer default.

ryot ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Kubero.

If you want the quickest setup, ryot is easier to run; Kubero needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Kubero](https://selfhost.directory/project/kubero) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kubero.md)
- [ryot](https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kubero-vs-ryot