# kriti-images vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | kriti-images | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 13 in Image Processing | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 268 | 132 689 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 234 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 1463 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.3.1 · 15 Dec 2025 | b11977 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 46/100 for kriti-images, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1463 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for kriti-images.

If you want the quickest setup, kriti-images is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [kriti-images](https://selfhost.directory/project/kriti-images) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kriti-images.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kriti-images-vs-llamacpp