# koodo-reader vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | koodo-reader | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 28 656 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +374 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.4.6 · 7 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

koodo-reader scores 78/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

koodo-reader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

koodo-reader is growing faster right now (+374 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [koodo-reader](https://selfhost.directory/project/koodo-reader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koodo-reader.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/koodo-reader-vs-uusec-waf