koodo-readervstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| koodo-reader | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 28 653 | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +371 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.4.6 · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
koodo-reader scores 78/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.
koodo-reader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; koodo-reader needs more configuration.
koodo-reader is growing faster right now (+371 stars in 30 days).
koodo-reader details →transfer.sh details →
Swap a project
Keep koodo-reader, compare it with
Keep transfer.sh, compare it with