# koodo-reader vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | koodo-reader | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 28 657 ✓ | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +365 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.4.6 · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

koodo-reader scores 78/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

koodo-reader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; koodo-reader needs more configuration.

koodo-reader is growing faster right now (+365 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [koodo-reader](https://selfhost.directory/project/koodo-reader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koodo-reader.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/koodo-reader-vs-qm-music