koodo-readervsqBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| koodo-reader | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #1 of 7 in Torrent |
| GitHub stars | 28 662 | 1 758 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +370 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 52 |
| Latest release | v2.4.6 · 7 Oct 2026 | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Dockerfile |
Which one should you pick?
koodo-reader scores 78/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for koodo-reader.
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; koodo-reader needs more configuration.
koodo-reader is growing faster right now (+370 stars in 30 days).
koodo-reader details →qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) details →
Swap a project
Keep koodo-reader, compare it with
Keep qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), compare it with