koodo-readervsMQTTX Web
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| koodo-reader | MQTTX Web | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #3 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 28 651 | 5 086 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +369 | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.4.6 · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
koodo-reader scores 78/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.
koodo-reader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.
If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; koodo-reader needs more configuration.
koodo-reader is growing faster right now (+369 stars in 30 days).
koodo-reader details →MQTTX Web details →
Swap a project
Keep koodo-reader, compare it with
Keep MQTTX Web, compare it with