koodo-readervsMeshCentral
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| koodo-reader | MeshCentral | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #2 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 28 654 | 7 531 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +372 | +253 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 16 |
| Latest release | v2.4.6 · 7 Oct 2026 | 1.3.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
koodo-reader scores 78/100 against 74/100 for MeshCentral, so it is the safer default.
koodo-reader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for MeshCentral.
If you want the quickest setup, MeshCentral is easier to run; koodo-reader needs more configuration.
koodo-reader details →MeshCentral details →
Swap a project
Keep koodo-reader, compare it with
Keep MeshCentral, compare it with