# Kong vs verdaccio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kong | verdaccio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in API Management | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 44 323 ✓ | 17 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +132 ✓ | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 29 ✓ |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Lua | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Kong scores 81/100 against 76/100 for verdaccio, so it is the safer default.

verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kong.

If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; Kong needs more configuration.

Kong is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kong](https://selfhost.directory/project/kong) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kong.md)
- [verdaccio](https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kong vs Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-traefik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-verdaccio